A significant development has emerged in the tragic case of Twisha Sharma, the daughter-in-law of a retired judge found dead at her Bhopal home last week. Bhopal Commissioner of Police Sanjay Kumar announced on Wednesday, May 20, 2026, that authorities have no objection to a second post-mortem examination. This comes after Twisha's family moved a local court, citing alleged lapses in the initial investigation and seeking a fresh autopsy at AIIMS Delhi. The case has drawn considerable attention due to accusations of dowry harassment and the absconding husband.

What Happened?

Twisha Sharma, a 33-year-old woman originally from Noida, was tragically discovered hanging at her marital residence in Bhopal sometime last week. This alarming incident quickly escalated into a legal battle as her family, devastated by her sudden death, promptly filed a plea demanding a more thorough and transparent investigation. They have put forward serious allegations, claiming that Twisha was subjected to persistent dowry harassment, a grave accusation that highlights a pervasive societal issue. The local court in Bhopal demonstrated its commitment to judicial oversight by formally requesting the police diary related to the case on Tuesday, May 19, 2026, indicating a deep dive into the procedural aspects of the inquiry.

The family's petition is rooted in several critical concerns that point towards potential shortcomings in the initial handling of the case. A primary grievance is the alleged delay in registering the First Information Report (FIR), which they contend was filed a full three days after Twisha was found dead, potentially hindering crucial early investigative steps. Furthermore, their legal submission brought to light a significant omission in the preliminary post-mortem report. It explicitly stated that investigators failed to provide the 'ligature' — the object purportedly used in the hanging — during the autopsy process. This absence of critical physical evidence has naturally fueled the family's suspicions and their call for a re-examination.

Responding to these pressing concerns and the family's formal application, Bhopal Commissioner of Police Sanjay Kumar issued a statement confirming that the police department holds no objection to a second post-mortem examination. He clarified that while the application has been duly attached to the case diary, the final authority to grant permission for a fresh autopsy rests solely with the court. Mr. Kumar further assured the public that dedicated police teams have been actively formed and dispatched to locate and apprehend Twisha's husband, advocate Samarth Singh. Singh, who married Twisha in December 2025, has reportedly gone into hiding since the incident. The police chief reiterated the department’s commitment to a comprehensive investigation, emphasizing that all evidence is being meticulously examined, though such processes inherently require time to ensure accuracy and fairness.

Key Highlights

Bhopal police have stated they have no objection to a second post-mortem for Twisha Sharma.
Twisha, daughter-in-law of a retired judge, was found hanging at her marital home.
Her family alleges dowry harassment and sought a fresh autopsy at AIIMS Delhi.
The initial post-mortem report reportedly failed to mention the 'ligature' used in the hanging.
Twisha's husband, Samarth Singh, is an advocate and is currently absconding.
Police teams have been formed to arrest the husband, Samarth Singh.
A local court in Bhopal is reviewing the case diary and holds the final say on a second post-mortem.

Why Does This Matter?

This case holds significant importance for several reasons, particularly for common people. It underscores the ongoing societal challenge of dowry harassment, a practice that continues to plague many families despite being illegal. The tragic death of Twisha Sharma brings to light the vulnerabilities faced by individuals who may be subjected to such demands. The family's persistent efforts to seek a second post-mortem also highlight the importance of thorough and transparent investigations in cases of suspicious deaths, ensuring that justice is not only done but also seen to be done.

Furthermore, the legal and procedural aspects of this case are crucial. The police commissioner's openness to a second autopsy, coupled with the court's involvement in reviewing the case diary, reinforces the checks and balances within the justice system. It shows that families have avenues to challenge initial findings and demand greater scrutiny when they suspect foul play or investigative gaps. This pursuit of truth is vital for public trust in law enforcement and the judiciary, offering a glimmer of hope for accountability in sensitive and complex situations like Twisha Sharma's death.